Dedicated to Defeating Congressman Scott Garrett in the 2010 Midterm Elections

Calling out MSNBC and Chris Matthews for enabling the radical right

In Uncategorized on March 11, 2010 at 12:54 am

I’ll start by saying that anyone who uses the sentence that “MSNBC is the only counterpart to FOX and the right wing noise machine” has their head completely up their ass. Two hours per day (Olbermann and Maddow) do not make up for the countless hours of “fair and balanced programming” that Chris Matthews, Joe Scarborough or much of the daytime programming comprises – certainly, this is a mixed bag at best and nothing near the ridiculously and blatantly skewed programming on FOX – or even worse, the “supposedly neutral” but SO NOT neutral CNN.

But I digress….

A couple of weeks back, Chris Matthews had two Congressmen on Hardball to discuss health care reform and how the issue could be moved forward in a bipartisan manner. The Republican Congressman appearing was New Jersey’s own Scott Garrett. At the end of the segment, Chris heaped effusive praise on Garrett, calling him his type of Northeastern Republican, which I guess means the most radically rightwing kind. He even invoked the word “moderate” to describe Garrett (at which mention Garrett visibly cringed).

To grasp the abject stupidity of Matthews’ misplaced admiration, you have to understand who Scott Garrett is and what he stands for. As we have documented here time and time again, Garrett is arguably THE most radical right-wing member of Congress. His illustrious legislative record includes, among many other things:

  • Voting against aid for victims of Katrina,
  • Voting against extending unemployment benefits for American families,
  • Voting against extending the Voting Rights Act,
  • Voting against providing health care to poor children,
  • Voting against anti-price gouging legislation holding big oil accountable,
  • Voting against taxing bonuses for Wall Street execs (he actually argued that they “deserved” them),
  • Voting for every bloated Bush budget, and
  • Voting for every dime spent in Iraq.

Oh, and by the way Chris – He’s also catering to the birthers – if not necessarily an outward one himself, having said at a public meeting that he wanted to see Obama’s birth certificate. Garrett further distinguished himself following the earthquake in Haiti. His message on his Congressional web site said the he was praying for those constituents of his affected by the quake. No mention of the thousands of Haitians who were dead or injured. Garrett also opposed abortion even in the case of rape or incestallowing a rapist to choose the mother of his child or a molesting father to force his daughter to bear his own grandchild. And he referred dismissively to the push to eliminate DADT as a “side issue” not worthy of his consideration. That’s Chris Matthews’ kind of Republican.

As Jason notes over at Blue Jersey, Garrett also recently appeared on MSNBC’s The Dylan Ratigan Show with guest host Ed Schultz. Once again he performed his one man show designed to portray himself as the sincere moderate that truly wants to work across party lines for the good of the American people. I can’t blame Ed because he was filling in at the last moment. But I can blame the show’s staff for not doing even a modicum of homework on their guest. Like Matthews, Schultz – someone who should know better – bought the well rehearsed charade hook, line and sinker.

By giving Garrett this kind of forum without challenging him on his record, MSNBC has aided and abetted an insidious political fraud. It is incumbent upon MSNBC to make sure this journalistic incontinence doesn’t happen again. First, try to actually do some research on your guests. You know, like Rachel Maddow does so well. Second, next time you extend an invitation for Congressman Garrett to appear on one of your infotainment shows, ask him why he voted time and time again to deprive Americans of their most basic civil rights. Then ask him how we can buy into his fairy tale of working toward a bipartisan utopia when he questions the very legitimacy of our President to serve in office based on debunked crackpot theories.

Maybe then MSNBC can begin to regain some semblance of journalistic integrity.

  1. Sent to Chris Matthews in February:

    From: phyamy
    Subject: Fw: Scott Garrett
    To: hardball@msnbc.com
    Date: Tuesday, February 9, 2010, 11:34 PM

    I must apologize for not having acknowledged the fact that you did slap Rep. Garrett for using the demeaning “Democrat” as opposed to “Democratic”. Thank you – I wish more people would do that.

    — On Tue, 2/9/10, phyamy wrote:

    From: phyamy
    Subject: Scott Garrett
    To: “hardball@msnbc.com”
    Date: Tuesday, February 9, 2010, 8:12 PM

    Dear Mr. Matthews,

    I was surprised at how non confrontational you were with Rep. Garrett tonight and it seemed that at the end of his time with you, you were quite complimentary. Perhaps there had been little preparation for the interview. Mr. Garrett, if I remember correctly, is so extreme that he would not even vote to ban pit bull fighting. A few years ago I attended a meering with him where he proudly presented a representive of Grover Noquist to speak to us. Marge Roukema, a Republican, was opposed to him. The man is an extremist.

    From Source Watch:
    He made two previous runs for the 5th District seat in the Republican primary, but was defeated each time by longtime incumbent Marge Roukema. When Roukema decided not to seek a 12th term in 2002, Garrett ran for and won the Republican nomination despite Roukema endorsing his major opponent. He faced Anne Sumers, a former Republican turned Democrat, in the general election. Sumers’ chances decreased significantly after she made several ill-advised comments about the U.S.-Taliban conflict on an Internet message board, and Garrett won in a rout. He was reelected almost as easily in 2004 with 58% of the vote. He declined to debate Anne Wolfe, his Democratic opponent, several times.
    Garrett is one of the most conservative Republicans to represent New Jersey in Congress in a long time. He has the highest rating from the American Conservative Union of any congressman from the Northeast, at a perfect 100.

    The following site gives an excellent and detailed summary of the Congressman’s voting record. Please consider what you see here because I believe that you would not approve of most of his positions.
    http://www.ontheissues.org/NJ/Scott_Garrett.htm
    Other articles.
    http://www.votesmart.org/summary.php?can_id=4430
    http://www.dumpgarrett.com/

    Thank you for your attention,
    Naomi Sternberg

  2. [...] Scott Garrett would vote against a cure for cancer if it came up for a vote in Congress. The only people who aren’t aware of that fact are the ones who just can’t bring themselves to follow the shitstorm that is American politics, and Chris Matthews. [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.